Thursday, 26 April 2001
A trial section in an American Road Rally?
Sunday, 22 April 2001
Friday, 20 April 2001
Situations Vacant
This role is about keep track of the kit car specifications, liasing with people who want to use a new/different kit car in class 7, liasing with the manufacturers to ensure that the vehicle is a legitimate entry (though not very much) and collating the specification for submission to ACTC Technical Panel for approval. Supplying newcomers (and not so new) with copies of specifications for cars they might want to use. This person also acts as arbiter of tyres inspecting tyres on request from competitors and passing judgement. This part of the job is not as onerous as it sounds, 6 new tyres have been insected in the last 12 months, and all were done either by inspection at an event or from photographs and prints in the privacy of home.
This role is the back room to the observers reports that some of you may have been asked to fill in. It requires the liason with all the organisers to obtain an early copy of each entry list from which 3-4 observers are selected for each event. They have to be written to in plenty of time for each event so that they can expess opinions of the organisation. Their reports then have to be collated into a summary for return to those organisers for their use and for submission to the ACTC Council. This is done for all ACTC events, not just the championship, and is very important for the selection of new events for the championship. In addition this person controls the scrutineering database. At each event the scrutineer fills in a report of all the dubious items that have been picked up on any vehicle and these are passed forward to the next event in which that person competes so that, in theory, if someone still hasn't fixed something after being told about it they can justifiably not be allowed to start. Happily it has never come to this.
Monday, 9 April 2001
Hill Poll Result
Saturday, 7 April 2001
Triple
Just got my copy of Triple which I immediately sat down and read from cover to cover as usual.
It was confirmed that Steve Harris is giving up the editor’s chair for "personal reasons". What a wonderful phrase. It's as informative as people that resign jobs "to pursue other interests"
I have a love hate relationship with both "Triple" and "Re-Start". I love reading them but always feel a bit controlled on an "auntie knows best" basis where either the editor or the establishment is controlling the information flow.
I have had my biggest problem with Re-Start in the days when Anne was in the editor’s chair. There was a lot of debate about the roughness of sections. I wrote a letter and Anne published an extract, which portrayed the complete opposite view I was trying to make, but endorsed her own opinion! I never really forgave her for that! In fairness to Re-Start's current editor I don't believe Pat would do that as she is very correct in everything she does and expects others to be as well. I have had a few e-mails when she has felt I was stepping out of line on my Web activities!
Steve Harris and I had a rather formal relationship when he used some stuff in Triple from my Web Site without asking or acknowledging where it came from. I thought this was most impolite and said so and he never used my stuff again! The whole thing was even more complicated as someone else wrote the piece, he had written it for the supplement I do for the Falcon magazine and I hadn't asked if I could publish it on the web myself! A mistake I haven't repeated and the author must have forgiven me as he still helps me out from time to time!
I also had problems in the past with the SODC magazine.
There is a bit of controversy over a letter Ian Blackburn wrote in an earlier Triple which upset a few members. Consequently, there is an apology in the latest Triple and a statement that "On reflection........... should not have been published".
That brings me back to paragraph 3. I believe (and will write to Triple to say so) that a member should be able to write a letter with the expectation that it is published. The fact that the club and/or it's members may or not agree or may be upset is irrelevant. It's the individuals opinion and he or she must stand the consequences if others don't like it. As much as I love my Triple I am over 21 and I don't want a sanitised "everything is rosy we all love each other " version. Or is all this perhaps part of the MCC charm? It probably is!
Michael